ئەرشیفەکانى هاوپۆل: English

(fr) Anarchist Federation – Jean-Marc, the struggle continues

(fr) Anarchist Federation – Jean-Marc, the struggle continues

Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 20:35:45 +0100

Jean-Marc Raynaud wasn’t always a troublemaker. He started out as a troublemaker in his youth. From high school onward, he and his friends from the Café de la Paix formed a discussion group focused on secularism; a theme that would stay with him throughout his life. His rationalist commitment as a freethinker was undeniable. With this group of friends, he also became involved in the anti-nuclear movement, opposing the Braud-et-Saint-Louis power plant and a harmful highway construction project. Few people know this, but when he enrolled in law school in Bordeaux, his intention was to become… a police commissioner! Fortunately, a wind of emancipation was blowing through the spring of 1968, and Jean-Marc became friends with Sanchez and Jean Barrué. The 1970s would be the decade in which his libertarian commitments were solidified. It was during this period that he joined the Anarchist Federation, held regular meetings in Rochefort, and campaigned for male contraception in general and vasectomy in particular. At the same time, he joined the cremationists’ union and their newspaper, “La Flamme” (The Flame), promoting the practice of cremation. He wasn’t ahead of his time; his time was behind him.

Once the ball was rolling, he would theorize and put into practice a life of continuous struggle, dedicated to creating concrete alternatives to the world he refused to accept. Uncle Bakunin’s summer camps, the self-managed daycare center, the Bonaventure libertarian school, and other such activities filled the time of this committed educator who, not content with simply taking action, also wrote numerous texts—more than 600 cataloged to date—for various activist newspapers and magazines.

“I always wanted to be a publisher,” Jean-Marc confided to his longtime friend, Jean-Claude Richard. On the advice of the latter, and after managing the publishing house Le Monde Libertaire, he founded Éditions Libertaires, which published over 250 books and awarded the prestigious Ni Dieu Ni Maître prize for many years. This publishing house still exists and is a benchmark in French-language anarchist publishing. Many authors join us in expressing their sadness.

Despite the great failure of his life—namely, achieving unity within the libertarian movement—Jean-Marc did not give up and tirelessly continued to defend a non-negotiable humanism. Thus, when the despicable Manuel Valls put the stripping of citizenship on the agenda during Hollande’s presidency, he publicly asked to have it revoked himself. The local press still remembers it.

Jean-Marc had his card. His citizen of the world card, which he never failed to show to the police. always quick to suppress the freedom of peoples.

Today, a great man leaves us, but his struggles and convictions will neither be forgotten nor abandoned.

We are all fierce Raynauds! Chaucre

Anarchist Federation

, Saint-George-d’Oléron

Wednesday, April 8, 2026

https://federation-anarchiste.org/?g=Lien_Permanent&b=1_27

The state is not a class instrument, but an instrument of a single class, the rich  and  the powerful people.

17/03/2026

Those who expect fundamental changes in the state may not understand the essence and nature of the state. The state is never in the interest of the workers and the poor, but is an instrument in the hands of their oppressors. That is why the very rich and the powerful people  support the the elections to vote for their candidate .

In US  there are 900 billionaires , 11 of whom have a combined net worth of $ 1.35 trillion and invited to the second inauguration of President Trump.

The billionaires donated more than $450m to elect Trump last year, Trump named a dozen billionaires to top positions. They include education secretary Linda McMahon ($3bn in wealth), commerce secretary Howard Lutnick ($3.2bn), and Steve Witkoff ($2bn) as chief Iran/Ukraine/Gaza negotiator. Trump also asked Musk (more than $800bn) to run the wrecking-ball crew at the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency”.

Showing how the system serves billionaires, the ultra-rich elite won lots of goodies in Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. Of its $2tn in tax cuts, $750bn will reportedly go to the richest 1% of Americans, according to Brookings.

It’s not your imagination that inequality is growing worse – billionaires are pulling further away from everyone else, with the number of billionaires jumping by more than 50% since 2017. The richest 1%, whose wealth has more than doubled since 2017, owns 32% of the nation’s wealth, more than 10 times the 2.5% share owned by the bottom 50%. The richest 0.1% own 14.4% of the nation’s wealth, up 6 percentage points since 1990.

Together those six donated nearly $1bn. According to OpenSecrets, Musk topped the list with more than $280m, while Timothy Mellon, an 83-year-old banking heir, was second at $197m. Miriam Adelson, widow of a casino magnate, was third at $147m. Michael Bloomberg was the top donor to Democrats at $64m.

billionaires’ political spending skyrocketed, jumping 160-fold since 2010 and 2.5 times since 2020. Billionaires gave $16m in the 2008 presidential election and $231m in the 2012 election, the first after Citizens United, before soaring to $2.6bn in 2024.

According to the Harris Poll’s annual Americans and Billionaires Survey, conducted last November, 53% of Americans believe billionaires threaten our democracy. What’s more, 71% of Americans, including 64% of Republicans, say there should be a wealth tax on top earners, and 53% (up from 46% in 2024) say there should be limits on wealth accumulation.

Iran. Let’s desert the war!

Iran. Let’s desert the war!

The US and Israeli attack on Iran has triggered an escalation of war that is setting on fire the area between the Mediterranean and the Persian Gulf.
A global explosion appears ever closer.

The risk for those who oppose the Iranian theocratic regime from an internationalist, class-based, and anti-patriarchal perspective is that the regime, weakened after the January uprising, will strengthen in the face of attacks.

The United States and Israel care nothing about the aspirations for freedom that cost no fewer than twenty thousand deaths and ten thousand political prisoners to those who chose to challenge the Islamic Republic.

Trump is not aiming for regime change that would meet the demands of the insurgents, because he is satisfied with securing favorable agreements in the energy sector.

At stake for the United States is control of resources and the Strait of Hormuz, the isolation of Russia, and an end to hydrocarbon trade with China.

Israel is attempting to settle scores with Hezbollah by exploiting divisions among Lebanese Shiites.
It is a risky operation, especially if the Israeli government is not content with controlling the Strip up to the Litani River, attempting a more in-depth ground operation, which could be very demanding militarily and a harbinger of new protests and defeatist initiatives internally.
Netanyahu is walking a razor’s edge, with a calculated move to secure a stronger position in the elections. The Likud government and its far-right religious allies are banking on expansion in the West Bank and war to avoid a voter rejection, which would spell the end of the prime minister and the current governing alliance. However, the strategy of unity in the face of a historic enemy risks becoming worn out, especially if the conflict is not short: thousands are fleeing from the north of the country, hit by a hail of missiles.
Thirty percent of Israel’s population, the poorest, has no safe haven against the bombs.

The Trump administration’s trade wars have failed to deliver the desired results, eroding part of the consensus it had gained by promising a return to the golden age, with the United States once again the linchpin of the global economy.
Polls indicate a sharp loss of support that could prove disastrous in the midterm elections.

The Trump administration, after the coup in Venezuela, is once again playing the military card, because it is the only area in which it maintains undeniable superiority over its strongest competitors.
This gamble is not without risks, as demonstrated by the tragic outcomes of the wars unleashed by the United States in Iraq and Afghanistan. These are countries where US military power enabled a victory on the ground that turned into a defeat, because the ferocity of the military occupation and the absence of solid allies, which only massive non-repayable investments could have guaranteed, led to retreats that demonstrate the US’s inability to implement its colonial projects.

Iran is not Venezuela. This is demonstrated by attacks that are far more forceful and incisive than the pantomimes carried out during the 12-day war last June.

Not only that.
Fifteen days into this this new bloody phase of the conflict, the United States and Israel, despite having inflicted severe blows on the Iranian military, massacring over a thousand civilians, appear unable to control the situation. The attempt to use Iranian Kurdish militias has so far been rebuffed by the newly formed coalition of parties from Iran’s Kurdish-speaking region.

The systemic chaos Trump is likely targeting could undermine US alliances in the region, which are already less solid than in the past.
Just consider a country like Turkey, a historic ally that has long been acting independently, actively supporting Palestinian factions linked to Hamas in Palestine, allying with Al Jolani in Syria, and settling accounts with the Kurdish opposition. Today, Turkey is bidding to become the region’s linchpin, a neo-Ottoman force, in direct competition with Israel.

In Iran, the internationalist, class-based, and anarchist political and social opposition opposes the war. Trump and Netanyahu’s war is not being fought in their name. The death of the tyrant does not bring the end of the dictatorship, because only the struggle of those who, from below, attempt to break the clerical and patriarchal order can open real horizons of freedom, sparking a revolutionary process.

Israeli and US bombs slaughter the civilian population while an increasingly bloodthirsty and ferocious regime deprives political prisoners of food and uses them as human shields on military bases.

Iranian anarchists oppose the war and the regime.
Israeli deserters and conscientious objectors supported the uprising in Iran and oppose the war.
We support them.

In our country, squares were animated by some sections of exiles chanting Israel and the United States’ attack on Iran.
In other squares, promoted by the diverse Italian left, flags of the Islamic Republic and images of Khamenei were waved.
Disturbing signs.

It’s a dark moment.
Italy, for years a logistics hub for the war in Ukraine and Gaza, now plays a key role in supporting the war in Iran.
The Sigonella bases and the MUOS in Niscemi play a central role in war intelligence operations.
The missile frigate Martinengo has been deployed to Cyprus, and military aid has been sent to the Gulf countries.
The government denies wanting to go to war, but our country has already been at war for years.
Italian military missions have been active for decades in Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Cyprus, Palestine, Egypt, as well as in the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa.

We desert.
We do not enlist on the side of this or that state.
We stand with those who desert war in every corner of the earth.

We want a world without borders, armies, oppression, or exploitation.

Only an international humankind can lay the foundations for that world of free and equal people that can put an end to war.

The fight to close Italian, US, and NATO military bases is more crucial than ever.

Deserting war is not just a slogan, but a concrete practice, strengthened by the transnational alliance of the oppressed and the exploited.
Let’s sabotage war!

The Correspondence Commission of the Italian Anarchist Federation – FAI

War is never the answer. International solidarity. Desertion

War is never the answer. International solidarity. Desertion

The recent attack on Iran carried out by the United States and Israel on February 28 is neither an isolated act nor a historical accident. It is yet another well-planned manifestation of an imperial logic that disguises aggression as defense, supremacy as security, war as a moral necessity, and capitalist imperialism as democracy. We know that every power, when it strikes, invokes the need for prevention; every bomb is carefully cloaked in technical, surgical, and inevitable language—and even words of peace. But we already know who will pay the price for such violence; the victims are always the same: children, workers, the poor, young people sent to their deaths, families losing their homes and futures, and oppressed peoples. And we also know that the chaos following this aggression will fuel new wars and further fanaticism.

Regimes can only be opposed and overthrown by their own people, and it is certain that even the popular movements that have opposed the Iranian regime in recent years will be swept away by American imperialist arrogance. Let it be clear: there are no humanitarian wars, nor are there any liberating bombings. Wars are political choices, not natural phenomena. There is a global structure of domination that feeds on fear, nationalism, and voluntary submission. Governments speak of existential threats, but the only permanent threat to the people is precisely the continuous and historical intertwining created by states between military power, economic interests, mafias, and media propaganda.

True security stems from social justice, cooperation among peoples, and an end to the economic exploitation that fuels conflict. True prevention lies in dismantling the state structures that generate war: military bases, the military-industrial complex, alliances based on the threat of constant conflict, and all repressive state laws that target any form of dissent.

Wars must be met with desertion. To desert today means, above all, to desert propaganda. It means rejecting ethnic and religious hatred. It means rejecting the rhetoric of inevitable war, rejecting the fear of true freedom. It means supporting conscientious objection, protecting those who oppose imperialism, and building grassroots international solidarity networks. It means opposing the militarization of our societies and our territories—from Birgi to MUOS and Sigonella—and defending spaces of autonomy, mutual aid, and direct organization.

We unequivocally condemn all forms of imperialism, regardless of the flag or state behind them. We denounce the hypocrisy of those who speak of international law while trampling on it. And we remember that no people are our enemies.

If there is a flame to be lit, it is that of solidarity among the oppressed.

If there is a rebellion to be waged, it is against blind obedience.

If there is a revolution to be prepared, it is one that makes war impossible because it makes domination over our lives impossible.

May consciences awaken. Let fear turn to rage. Let those in power know they can no longer count on our passivity and our fear of being free.

Against every state. Against every regime.

Against imperialist war: Desertion, International Solidarity.

Only a society of free and equal people will sweep away all imperialism.

Sicilian Anarchist Federation

March 2, 2026

Against war and militarism, against governments and the state, against capitalism that cannot live without war!

We anarchists are against war on the basis of anti-capitalist revolutionary principles, historical experience and understanding of the hidden causes, motives and goals behind the propaganda of wars and militarization. To the best of our ability, we will fight military war and all other forms of war at all appropriate levels, except the social war of the oppressed against the rulers and capitalists. As the wars in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc. have shown, no war between governments, militias and parties has anything to do with the dreams of the poor and powerless, but for the hidden goals of global companies and we see that the first and main victims of these wars will be the people in whose name the wars are waged.

In fact we are against any factors or motives that used to justify wars. We only justify one war that wages free the exploited and oppressed people, this is the war against the locals and central governments. we support the liberation of nations to the best of our ability, but we do not justify any capitalist war under the guise of the liberation of nations and sections of society. We see it as an indirect war against the oppressed classes by the Iranian Mullahs and the regional governments.

Furthermore, we see war not only as gunfire and killing people, but as an obvious part of other daily wars waged by the capitalist system against the environment, animals, libertarian and oppressed peoples in every corner of the world that includes the military confliction as well.
We are against the Iranian dictatorial regime with the same ability and level of opposition to the US-Israeli that launched war against Iran. We do not see any legitimate reason for this war. If the problem is the dictatorship of the Iranian Mullahs regime, then the US and its allies in Afghanistan brought the Taliban back to power. Like the Iranian Mullahs regime, the Gulf regimes are dictatorial, anti-women and even child slaves America is being oppressed and discriminated against. Like the Iranian Mullahs regime, the Gulf regimes are dictatorial, anti-women and even child slavers. So more or less America practices the same thing in executing its own people and discrimination against black people and indigenous peoples of the United States.
Of course, the brutality of the US government cannot justify the brutality of the authoritarians or any other regime. Here we point out that their war has nothing to do with the liberation of the oppressed peoples of Iran, Instead, like the ruling Shiite parties in Iraq and the Kurdish political parties in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, they are killing libertarian people, freedom-seeking and people ask for the nation state. They kill anybody who dare to raise their voice against them just to keep themselves in power.
While opposing and condemning the US-Israeli war against Iran, we oppose and condemn the antisemitic war of the Islamic regime of Iran against (Israeli civilians and against the people of Kurdistan, Khuzestan, Baluchistan and Azerbaijan). We also declare our opposition to the war and attacks of the Pakistani government on Afghan cities.
We consider ourselves in support of the liberation struggle of all oppressed nations and oppressed classes of the world and on this basis, we are against any war, such as a war between governments and militias for sovereignty and ensuring the enjoyment of the suffering of the oppressed.
We are anarchists and just as we are the most radical enemies of the power and management of the state and its companies, we are the most radical supporters of the liberation of groups and the social self-government of cultural and ethnic minorities.

No to unjust war (war of companies, governments and militias)
No to invasion, dictatorship, prison regime and the Islamic coast
No to the state and capitalism
No to war, environmental destruction and the destruction of animals
Yes, to the struggle and war of the oppressed and subjugated peoples against local governments and powers
Yes to the revolutionary solidarity of the oppressed people around the world.

Kurdish- speaking Anarchist Forum ( Kaf )
04/03/2026
https://linktr.ee/anarkistan

Against war and militarism, against governments and the state, against capitalism that cannot live without war!

Against war and militarism, against governments and the state, against capitalism that cannot live without war!

We anarchists are against war on the basis of anti-capitalist revolutionary principles, historical experience and understanding of the hidden causes, motives and goals behind the propaganda of wars and militarization. To the best of our ability, we will fight military war and all other forms of war at all appropriate levels, except the social war of the oppressed against the rulers and capitalists. As the wars in Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, etc. have shown, no war between governments, militias and parties has anything to do with the dreams of the poor and powerless, but for the hidden goals of global companies and we see that the first and main victims of these wars will be the people in whose name the wars are waged.

In fact we are against any factors or motives that used to justify wars. We only justify one war that wages free the exploited and oppressed people, this is the war against the locals and central governments. we support the liberation of nations to the best of our ability, but we do not justify any capitalist war under the guise of the liberation of nations and sections of society. We see it as an indirect war against the oppressed classes by the Iranian Mullahs and the regional governments.

Furthermore, we see war not only as gunfire and killing people, but as an obvious part of other daily wars waged by the capitalist system against the environment, animals, libertarian and oppressed peoples in every corner of the world that includes the military confliction as well.

We are against the Iranian dictatorial regime with the same ability and level of opposition to the US-Israeli that launched war against Iran. We do not see any legitimate reason for this war. If the problem is the dictatorship of the Iranian Mullahs regime, then the US and its allies in Afghanistan brought the Taliban back to power. Like the Iranian Mullahs regime, the Gulf regimes are dictatorial, anti-women and even child slaves America is being oppressed and discriminated against. Like the Iranian Mullahs regime, the Gulf regimes are dictatorial, anti-women and even child slavers. So more or less America practices the same thing in executing its own people and discrimination against black people and indigenous peoples of the United States.

Of course, the brutality of the US government cannot justify the brutality of the authoritarians or any other regime. Here we point out that their war has nothing to do with the liberation of the oppressed peoples of Iran, Instead, like the ruling Shiite parties in Iraq and the Kurdish political parties in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, they are killing libertarian people, freedom-seeking and people ask for the nation state. They kill anybody who dare to raise their voice against them just to keep themselves in power.

While opposing and condemning the US-Israeli war against Iran, we oppose and condemn the antisemitic war of the Islamic regime of Iran against (Israeli civilians and against the people of Kurdistan, Khuzestan, Baluchistan and Azerbaijan). We also declare our opposition to the war and attacks of the Pakistani government on Afghan cities.

We consider ourselves in support of the liberation struggle of all oppressed nations and oppressed classes of the world and on this basis, we are against any war, such as a war between governments and militias for sovereignty and ensuring the enjoyment of the suffering of the oppressed.

We are anarchists and just as we are the most radical enemies of the power and management of the state and its companies, we are the most radical supporters of the liberation of groups and the social self-government of cultural and ethnic minorities.

No to unjust war (war of companies, governments and militias)

No to invasion, dictatorship, prison regime and the Islamic coast

No to the state and capitalism

No to war, environmental destruction and the destruction of animals

Yes, to the struggle and war of the oppressed and subjugated peoples against local governments and powers

Yes to the revolutionary solidarity of the oppressed people around the world.

Kurdish- speaking Anarchist Forum ( Kaf )

04/03/2026

https://linktr.ee/anarkistan

Anarchists in Iran, Iraq, the Middle East, and the World

Anarchists in Iran, Iraq, the Middle East, and the World

Greetings

Unfortunately, there has been no reaction to the American and Israeli attacks on Iran on your websites and channels. It seems that you, your groups, and your unions are absent from this critical moment in history!

Have the principles of anarchism changed and are you no longer against war? Or have you forgotten your principles and now expect bombers to provide “just governance” and save the oppressed?

Don’t you consider war between superpowers against the oppressed to be a war against the oppressed?

Why did you previously stand against the wars in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya, and protest loudly in the streets, while now you turn a blind eye and remain silent regarding the recent (American and Israeli) attacks?

Are you waiting for a miracle for the oppressed Iranians to achieve their “freedom” with American missiles?

Why were previous wars so destructive, while this one suddenly seems constructive?

You know that this silence will be recorded against you. History has always proven that war has never been a savior for the oppressed, nor has it ever created in the hearts of class societies the idea of ​​”just government” or a utopia of equality and justice in the struggle for power.

Please look for the answer to this question in the pages of the history of class societies:

Where and at what point in world history did freedom, equality, and anarchism emerge from the heart of war and with the help of bombers?

No to war!
No to your silence, “anarchists”!
No to the state!
No to the Islamic government!
No to the return of the monarchy in Iran!

Yes to social struggle against war, the state, and the class system!

@Hejeen

https://www.facebook.com/hejen.pize

The Anarchist Group in Sudan on the war

The Anarchist Group in Sudan

We are following with concern the escalating criminal behavior of the international regimes between Israel, the United States, and Iran. In reality, this conflict is deeper than its media presentation; it is an attempt to drag the entire region into a senseless war in which the peoples will become victims of authoritarian regimes and of global imperialism’s attempts to dominate in new ways.

It is the right of peoples to change their political systems themselves, not for another state to do so in order to strengthen its allies. What the United States seeks in this region is a new ally that will facilitate the exploitation of resources, the control of peoples, and the suppression of resistance movements.

Resistance to imperialism under dictatorship is nothing but a new form of dictatorship. While we condemn the fascist Iranian regime and stand in solidarity with the peoples striving for freedom, we affirm that Israeli intervention in the region and its consequences amount to nothing more than replacing Iranian dictatorship with American dictatorship.

From our complex position, at a time when a senseless imperialist war—supported by the same Iranian and American alliances—looms, we in the group firmly reject the control of peoples under the pretext of bringing them freedom. Peoples seize their freedom themselves; no one does it for them.

We call on comrades around the world to unite and stand in solidarity with comrades in Iran and Lebanon. We tell our comrades in Iran and Lebanon that despite our difficult situation, we are following the developments on your side, our hearts are with you, and our homes are open to you if needed. We will do everything we can to cooperate with you.

Long live the struggle of the liberation movement across the world.

No to imperialist war.

← Back

Your message has been sent

The Anarchist Group in Sudan on the war /1

The Anarchist Group in Sudan

The Anarchist Group in Sudan strongly condemns all acts of aggression carried out by the conflicting parties against the people. We affirm that such violence is the inevitable outcome of authoritarian systems and the destruction they bring upon societies.

To our anarchist comrades in Iran and Lebanon, we extend our full solidarity and heartfelt support. We hope for your safety and well-being, and we stand with you during these difficult times.

Revolutionary greetings.

The Reproduction of Dictatorship

The Reproduction of Dictatorship

Following the December 2019 Revolution, Sudan witnessed a significant rise in demands for radical solutions capable of restoring freedoms to a people who had endured nearly fifty consecutive years of military dictatorship and repression. For the first time, a revolution emerged in an organized form, rooted in genuine popular structures represented by neighborhood Resistance Committees and revolutionary youth united around a clear objective: the overthrow of dictatorship.

Yet counterrevolutionary forces consistently worked to dismantle these revolutionary forces. They targeted the Resistance Committees, arrested the youth, and killed hundreds of revolutionaries in an attempt to extinguish the spirit of change. Despite this, the flame of December continues to burn to this day.

However, the current crisis lies in the growing power of counterrevolutionary forces that exploit the war to advance their own agendas — reshaping society along authoritarian ideological lines, normalizing violence, and paving the way for a renewed cycle of despotism — all amid the absence of cohesive and unified revolutionary forces. At the same time, we are witnessing behavioral and political fragmentation within the opposition, with some factions choosing to endorse the war or actively participate in it by supporting one of its parties, thereby deepening the political and moral crisis.

Moreover, many young people — by which we mean the generation that fully grasped the meaning of the revolution and lived through its experience — lack a clear political vision and an organized program capable of translating their emancipatory aspirations into sustained action. Traditional political organizations have largely failed to meet these revolutionary expectations or meaningfully engage this generation.

The continuity and durability of the revolution and emancipatory thought do not depend solely on revolutionary enthusiasm. They require organization and a structured revolutionary program — elements that are currently lacking within Sudan’s youth movement. Amid immense pressures and conditions of siege under which we operate, we strive to create even a small emancipatory space where revolutionary youth can articulate their aspirations free from political repression, systematic domination, and ideological control — practices that are often reproduced even within parts of the opposition itself.

Building such a liberatory space demands substantial organizational effort, a sober and precise reading of the political environment, and a collective will to reestablish revolutionary action on more conscious and resilient foundations.

Fawaz Murtada